Grow a Garden Trading Guide

The July 2, 2026 baseline assigns Dragonfly 145 Trade Index points and a High demand label. The record is a starting reference, not a documented transaction at that price.

Its stored rarity and tier are classifications in the dataset. They should not be presented as newly checked game facts.

A source may describe a pet using tokens, currency, weight, age or another metric. The same item name does not make those measurements equal to an internal score.

Before proposing a value change, identify what the number measures. A label that cannot be normalized with an approved method must remain incompatible or under review.

The Dragonfly record does not model pet age, weight, mutations or offer-specific utility. There is no supported multiplier here for converting those attributes into points.

When two pets have different attributes, the missing information is part of the comparison. It is not a reason to apply a guessed premium.

Two source numbers can disagree because their units or variants differ. That does not automatically prove a market move or an error in one source.

A review should identify the mismatch and record its decision. Pending evidence must not be silently blended into the current score or the public history.

Same-game, same-unit neighbors can identify other references near Dragonfly's score. A similar number is a starting point for inspection, not an exchange promise.

Compare each item's demand label and review date. Missing demand is unknown, and an unchanged baseline does not establish stable player demand.

Confirm the offered item's identity and attributes in the game. Then check whether the Trade Index record covers them, whether a later review exists and whether any unresolved source warning applies.

If the unit remains unclear, stop the numerical comparison. Keep the useful result: you have identified which evidence is missing before acting.