Grow a Garden item record

Dragonfly Value and Review History

Review the stored Dragonfly score, demand estimate, nearby pet scores, evidence dates, and gaps in the record.

Trade Index score145
DemandHigh
BaselineJuly 2, 2026
Last reviewedNo later item review

Baseline is the earliest approved record. Last reviewed means a later human-approved item review. Last checked means a source comparison, which is separate.

Your local watchlist

Scores are stored comparison estimates, not currency or guaranteed exchange rates.

Why does Dragonfly have a 145-point baseline?

Dragonfly starts at 145 points with a High demand label. The score is an internal comparison estimate, not currency. The record does not include an approved rationale explaining why 145 was selected instead of a nearby number.

The baseline also assigns tier C and Ultra-Rare rarity. These are stored classifications, not fresh evidence of offer frequency. Pet age, weight and mutations are not priced in this record, so the same 145-point figure cannot be applied to every variant.

The nearby pet table provides same-unit reference numbers for a specific comparison. Check the offered pet attributes and dated source evidence before using them. Trade Index does not yet have enough reviewed evidence to explain this value beyond the baseline.

Evidence and limits

Latest successful item-level comparison
No successful item-level comparison is recorded in the review ledger.
Last approved item review
No approved item review after the baseline
Last recorded numerical direction
No approved movement recorded
Demand history
Previous label: Not recorded. Direction: No approved movement recorded.
Variation in stored observations
Not enough approved observations
Source agreement
Not enough comparable source evidence
Liquidity and confidence
Not measured. No transaction sample or calibrated confidence score is available.
  • Pet age, weight, mutations, and offer-specific utility are not modeled in this record.
  • No transaction sample establishes how quickly Dragonfly trades or whether its value has changed since the baseline.

Recorded history

No approved item changes have been recorded after the baseline. This does not establish that the market stayed unchanged. No historical chart is shown without observations.

Baseline only. There is not enough approved numerical history for a chart or a trend. A stored baseline does not establish that the market stayed unchanged.

Descriptive variation needs at least five numerical observations, numerical approvals spanning at least two weeks, and a nonzero mean.

Baseline and approved item history. Source checks and pending proposals do not add published observations.
RecordEvidence dateReviewTrade Index scoreDemandReason
Existing dataset baselineJuly 2, 2026Dataset baseline only. No item rereview.145HighPreserved starting snapshot

Nearby stored numbers

Selected from the same game and unit by the smallest absolute difference: |other current number - this current number|. Ties use alphabetical order. This is a numerical comparison, not a recommended trade.

Nearest same-game stored numbers
ItemTrade Index scoreDifferenceDemand
Ruby Squid16015High
Reaper9847Medium
Headless Horseman9550Medium
Phoenix21570Medium

Source comparisons

No item-specific source comparison is stored in the review ledger. The latest game-level collection is summarized below.

    Approved history is linked to source observations. A failed check or an unresolved disagreement does not replace the stored value.

    Source registry and limitations

    Put this record to use

    Compare a multi-item offer
    Understand value versus demand

    Editorial rationale: No approved item review notes exist after the baseline. The explanation above describes stored facts and arithmetic, not a new market conclusion.

    No approved market reports yet. A report can publish only after a named human reviewer records an approval, review date, original commentary, evidence references, and at least one successful item comparison in its window.

    Evidence ledger

    Evidence for Grow a Garden

    Published dates and source checks answer different questions. A source check does not publish a new value or verify when an item last changed.

    Grow a Garden

    Baseline retained
    Dataset baseline
    Latest source check
    Source evidence
    The latest source check produced no compatible Grow a Garden value comparison.
    Published data
    No approved item-level changes beyond the baseline are recorded.
    Pending proposals in current ledger
    0