Grow a Garden item record

Venom Mimic Octopus: A Bundle Can Cross the Score

Check a 305-point Garden bundle against the 310-point Venom Mimic Octopus baseline without treating a five-point gap as certainty.

Trade Index score310
DemandHigh
BaselineJuly 2, 2026
Last reviewedNo later item review

Baseline is the earliest approved record. Last reviewed means a later human-approved item review. Last checked means a source comparison, which is separate.

Compare this itemView Grow a Garden Market
Your local watchlist

Scores are stored comparison estimates, not currency or guaranteed exchange rates.

How do Ruby Squid and Dragonfly compare with Venom Mimic Octopus together?

Ruby Squid is 160 and Dragonfly is 145 in the baseline. Together they total 305, compared with Venom Mimic Octopus at 310. The bundle is 5 points lower, approximately 1.61% of the single-item score. This is a small numerical gap in the saved data.

All three records are labeled High demand. That does not show that two High-demand items are as easy to exchange as one High-demand item. The category describes each record and has no documented mathematical rule for combining trading speed.

The useful next check is whether the proposed items match the records being summed, including any relevant attributes not captured by this dataset. The five-point remainder cannot justify overlooking those differences or declaring the offer fair.

Evidence and limits

Last item source comparison
Not recorded
Last approved item review
No approved item review after the baseline
Latest editorial decision
No item editorial decision recorded
Last recorded numerical direction
No approved movement recorded
Demand history
Previous label: Not recorded. Direction: No approved movement recorded.
Variation in stored observations
Not enough approved observations
Source agreement
Not enough comparable source evidence
Liquidity and confidence
Not measured. No transaction sample or calibrated confidence score is available.
Pending proposals
0. Proposals do not change published values until approved.
  • Pet attributes are not included in this 305-versus-310 calculation.
  • The ledger has no uncertainty estimate precise enough to turn a five-point gap into a verdict.

Recorded history

No approved item changes have been recorded after the baseline. This does not establish that the market stayed unchanged. No historical chart is shown without observations.

Baseline only. There is not enough approved numerical history for a chart or a trend. A stored baseline does not establish that the market stayed unchanged.

Descriptive variation needs at least five numerical observations, numerical approvals spanning at least two weeks, and a nonzero mean.

Baseline and approved item history. Source checks and pending proposals do not add published observations.
RecordEvidence dateReviewTrade Index scoreDemandReason
Existing dataset baselineJuly 2, 2026Dataset baseline only. No item rereview.310HighPreserved starting snapshot

Nearby stored numbers

Selected from the same game and unit by the smallest absolute difference: |other current number - this current number|. Ties use alphabetical order. This is a numerical comparison, not a recommended trade.

Nearest same-game stored numbers
ItemTrade Index scoreDifferenceDemand
Mimic Octopus28030Very High
Fennec Fox24070Very High
Phoenix21595Medium
Ruby Squid160150High

Source comparisons

No item-level source comparison is recorded yet. The dataset baseline does not count as a fresh source check.

    Approved history is linked to source observations. A failed check or an unresolved disagreement does not replace the stored value.

    Source registry and limitations

    Put this record to use

    Compare a multi-item offer
    Understand value versus demand

    Editorial rationale: No approved item review notes exist after the baseline. The explanation above describes stored facts and arithmetic, not a new market conclusion.

    No approved market reports yet. A report can publish only after a named human reviewer records an approval, review date, original commentary, evidence references, and at least one successful item comparison in its window.

    Evidence dates

    When was each dataset checked?

    A source check records a collection attempt. An editorial review records a decision. The original baseline is not a new item review.