Grow a Garden item record

Fennec Fox: A Midpoint Does Not Average Demand

Locate Fennec Fox between two selected Garden baseline scores and keep numerical position separate from demand categories.

Trade Index score240
DemandVery High
BaselineJuly 2, 2026
Last reviewedNo later item review

Baseline is the earliest approved record. Last reviewed means a later human-approved item review. Last checked means a source comparison, which is separate.

Your local watchlist

Scores are stored comparison estimates, not currency or guaranteed exchange rates.

What does Fennec Fox between Phoenix and Mimic Octopus actually mean?

Phoenix is 215, Fennec Fox is 240, and Mimic Octopus is 280 in the baseline. Fennec Fox is 25 points above Phoenix and 40 below Mimic Octopus. The midpoint of the two reference scores is 247.5, so Fennec Fox sits 7.5 points below that midpoint.

Demand does not follow the same interpolation. Phoenix is Medium, while Fennec Fox and Mimic Octopus are Very High. A number between two scores does not imply a demand label halfway between their labels.

This position is useful for choosing two numerical reference points when inspecting an offer. It does not establish that Fennec Fox is undervalued, that the midpoint is a target, or that its score should move toward either reference.

Evidence and limits

Last item source comparison
Not recorded
Last approved item review
No approved item review after the baseline
Latest editorial decision
No item editorial decision recorded
Last recorded numerical direction
No approved movement recorded
Demand history
Previous label: Not recorded. Direction: No approved movement recorded.
Variation in stored observations
Not enough approved observations
Source agreement
Not enough comparable source evidence
Liquidity and confidence
Not measured. No transaction sample or calibrated confidence score is available.
Pending proposals
0. Proposals do not change published values until approved.
  • The 247.5 midpoint is an illustrative calculation, not an editorial valuation.
  • No time series supports a forecast based on Fennec Fox sitting between these scores.

Recorded history

No approved item changes have been recorded after the baseline. This does not establish that the market stayed unchanged. No historical chart is shown without observations.

Baseline only. There is not enough approved numerical history for a chart or a trend. A stored baseline does not establish that the market stayed unchanged.

Descriptive variation needs at least five numerical observations, numerical approvals spanning at least two weeks, and a nonzero mean.

Baseline and approved item history. Source checks and pending proposals do not add published observations.
RecordEvidence dateReviewTrade Index scoreDemandReason
Existing dataset baselineJuly 2, 2026Dataset baseline only. No item rereview.240Very HighPreserved starting snapshot

Nearby stored numbers

Selected from the same game and unit by the smallest absolute difference: |other current number - this current number|. Ties use alphabetical order. This is a numerical comparison, not a recommended trade.

Nearest same-game stored numbers
ItemTrade Index scoreDifferenceDemand
Phoenix21525Medium
Mimic Octopus28040Very High
Venom Mimic Octopus31070High
Ruby Squid16080High

Source comparisons

No item-level source comparison is recorded yet. The dataset baseline does not count as a fresh source check.

    Approved history is linked to source observations. A failed check or an unresolved disagreement does not replace the stored value.

    Source registry and limitations

    Put this record to use

    Compare a multi-item offer
    Understand value versus demand

    Editorial rationale: No approved item review notes exist after the baseline. The explanation above describes stored facts and arithmetic, not a new market conclusion.

    No approved market reports yet. A report can publish only after a named human reviewer records an approval, review date, original commentary, evidence references, and at least one successful item comparison in its window.

    Evidence dates

    When was each dataset checked?

    A source check records a collection attempt. An editorial review records a decision. The original baseline is not a new item review.