Grow a Garden item record

Ruby Squid: A Score Ratio Is Not a Pet Count

Work through the Ruby Squid to Dragonfly baseline ratio and learn why a fractional ratio is not an executable exchange.

Trade Index score160
DemandHigh
BaselineJuly 2, 2026
Last reviewedNo later item review

Baseline is the earliest approved record. Last reviewed means a later human-approved item review. Last checked means a source comparison, which is separate.

Compare this itemView Grow a Garden Market
Your local watchlist

Scores are stored comparison estimates, not currency or guaranteed exchange rates.

Can the Ruby Squid and Dragonfly score ratio tell me how many pets to offer?

Ruby Squid is 160 in the baseline and Dragonfly is 145. Dividing 160 by 145 gives approximately 1.1034. The ratio says how the stored numbers relate. It does not mean an offer can contain 1.1034 Dragonflies or that a trader would accept one plus a calculated fraction.

The practical one-item comparison has a 15-point gap, approximately 10.34% of Dragonfly. Both labels are High demand, so the available categories do not choose between them. This example distinguishes continuous score arithmetic from the whole-item quantities used in a trade.

If you add another item to a proposed side, name that item and use its own recorded score. Do not treat the 15 points as currency or invent a fractional pet. The resulting bundle must be evaluated as a new composition with its own evidence limits.

Evidence and limits

Last item source comparison
Not recorded
Last approved item review
No approved item review after the baseline
Latest editorial decision
No item editorial decision recorded
Last recorded numerical direction
No approved movement recorded
Demand history
Previous label: Not recorded. Direction: No approved movement recorded.
Variation in stored observations
Not enough approved observations
Source agreement
Not enough comparable source evidence
Liquidity and confidence
Not measured. No transaction sample or calibrated confidence score is available.
Pending proposals
0. Proposals do not change published values until approved.
  • Scores are internal comparison estimates and cannot be redeemed as fractional items.
  • A matching demand category supplies no preference data for a Ruby Squid versus Dragonfly offer.

Recorded history

No approved item changes have been recorded after the baseline. This does not establish that the market stayed unchanged. No historical chart is shown without observations.

Baseline only. There is not enough approved numerical history for a chart or a trend. A stored baseline does not establish that the market stayed unchanged.

Descriptive variation needs at least five numerical observations, numerical approvals spanning at least two weeks, and a nonzero mean.

Baseline and approved item history. Source checks and pending proposals do not add published observations.
RecordEvidence dateReviewTrade Index scoreDemandReason
Existing dataset baselineJuly 2, 2026Dataset baseline only. No item rereview.160HighPreserved starting snapshot

Nearby stored numbers

Selected from the same game and unit by the smallest absolute difference: |other current number - this current number|. Ties use alphabetical order. This is a numerical comparison, not a recommended trade.

Nearest same-game stored numbers
ItemTrade Index scoreDifferenceDemand
Dragonfly14515High
Phoenix21555Medium
Reaper9862Medium
Headless Horseman9565Medium

Source comparisons

No item-level source comparison is recorded yet. The dataset baseline does not count as a fresh source check.

    Approved history is linked to source observations. A failed check or an unresolved disagreement does not replace the stored value.

    Source registry and limitations

    Put this record to use

    Compare a multi-item offer
    Understand value versus demand

    Editorial rationale: No approved item review notes exist after the baseline. The explanation above describes stored facts and arithmetic, not a new market conclusion.

    No approved market reports yet. A report can publish only after a named human reviewer records an approval, review date, original commentary, evidence references, and at least one successful item comparison in its window.

    Evidence dates

    When was each dataset checked?

    A source check records a collection attempt. An editorial review records a decision. The original baseline is not a new item review.