Steal a Brainrot item record
Meowl: Large Income Gaps Need a Clear Denominator
Put the 50M-per-second baseline income gap in proportion and compare Meowl with an equal-rate record without inventing trade prices.
Baseline is the earliest approved record. Last reviewed means a later human-approved item review. Last checked means a source comparison, which is separate.
Income is a stored game statistic, not a trading price. No trade-value score is assigned on this page.
How large is the Meowl and Strawberry Elephant income gap relative to the rates?
Meowl is recorded at 300,000,000 income per second and Strawberry Elephant at 350,000,000. The difference of 50,000,000 per second is approximately 16.67% of Meowl. A large-looking absolute number can be understood more clearly when the unit and denominator are stated.
Dragon Gingerini also has a baseline rate of 300,000,000 per second. It matches Meowl on this single field, while Strawberry Elephant is higher. That gives two distinct comparisons: an equal-rate reference and a higher-rate reference. It does not produce a ranking by trade value.
Demand is unknown for all three records. No claim about scarcity, popularity, or price follows from these rates. Check the source evidence and any approved changes before treating the preserved baseline as a current statement about game production.
Evidence and limits
- Last item source comparison
- Not recorded
- Last approved item review
- No approved item review after the baseline
- Latest editorial decision
- No item editorial decision recorded
- Last recorded numerical direction
- No approved movement recorded
- Demand history
- Previous label: Not recorded. Direction: No approved movement recorded.
- Variation in stored observations
- Not enough approved observations
- Source agreement
- Not enough comparable source evidence
- Liquidity and confidence
- Not measured. No transaction sample or calibrated confidence score is available.
- Pending proposals
- 0. Proposals do not change published values until approved.
- The 50,000,000 gap is per second, not currency paid in a trade.
- The dataset does not isolate bonuses or provide transactions to explain a Meowl premium.
Recorded history
No approved item changes have been recorded after the baseline. This does not establish that the market stayed unchanged. No historical chart is shown without observations.
Baseline only. There is not enough approved numerical history for a chart or a trend. A stored baseline does not establish that the market stayed unchanged.
Descriptive variation needs at least five numerical observations, numerical approvals spanning at least two weeks, and a nonzero mean.
| Record | Evidence date | Review | Income per second | Demand | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Existing dataset baseline | July 2, 2026 | Dataset baseline only. No item rereview. | 300,000,000 | Not recorded | Preserved starting snapshot |
Nearby stored numbers
Selected from the same game and unit by the smallest absolute difference: |other current number - this current number|. Ties use alphabetical order. This is a numerical comparison, not a recommended trade.
| Item | Income per second | Difference | Demand |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dragon Gingerini | 300,000,000 | 0 | Not measured |
| Strawberry Elephant | 350,000,000 | 50,000,000 | Not measured |
| Dragon Cannelloni | 200,000,000 | 100,000,000 | Not measured |
| Headless Horseman | 175,000,000 | 125,000,000 | Not measured |
Source comparisons
No item-level source comparison is recorded yet. The dataset baseline does not count as a fresh source check.
Approved history is linked to source observations. A failed check or an unresolved disagreement does not replace the stored value.
Source registry and limitationsPut this record to use
Compare a multi-item offerUnderstand value versus demand
Editorial rationale: No approved item review notes exist after the baseline. The explanation above describes stored facts and arithmetic, not a new market conclusion.
No approved market reports yet. A report can publish only after a named human reviewer records an approval, review date, original commentary, evidence references, and at least one successful item comparison in its window.
Evidence dates
When was each dataset checked?
A source check records a collection attempt. An editorial review records a decision. The original baseline is not a new item review.
Steal a Brainrot
- Latest source check attempt
- No source check recorded yet
- Latest successful source check
- Not recorded
- Latest item editorial decision
- No item review recorded yet
- Existing dataset baseline
- July 2, 2026