Adopt Me item record
Crow: Equal Bundle Totals Can Hide Different Labels
Compare Crow plus Turtle with Evil Unicorn plus Elephant: equal baseline totals, different demand-label distributions.
Draft analysis. Awaiting editorial review, excluded from search indexing. Stored values retain their original review dates.
Baseline is the earliest approved record. Last reviewed means a later human-approved item review. Last checked means a source comparison, which is separate.
Scores are stored comparison estimates, not currency or guaranteed exchange rates.
Do two equal-score Crow bundles have the same demand profile?
Crow at 600 plus Turtle at 380 totals 980 in the baseline. Evil Unicorn at 620 plus Elephant at 360 also totals 980. The point difference is zero. This equality is an arithmetic property of four stored records, not evidence that those bundles exchange evenly in practice.
Crow and Evil Unicorn each carry Medium demand. Turtle is Very High, while Elephant is High. The two sides therefore have different label distributions despite matching totals. A total alone would hide that distinction.
Use the analyzer to retain both views: the numerical sum and the count of items in each demand category. Do not collapse the labels into an invented bonus. The ledger supplies no formula for assigning extra score to a Very High label compared with a High label.
Evidence and limits
- Last item source comparison
- Not recorded
- Last approved item review
- No approved item review after the baseline
- Latest editorial decision
- No item editorial decision recorded
- Last recorded numerical direction
- No approved movement recorded
- Demand history
- Previous label: Not recorded. Direction: No approved movement recorded.
- Variation in stored observations
- Not enough approved observations
- Source agreement
- Not enough comparable source evidence
- Liquidity and confidence
- Not measured. No transaction sample or calibrated confidence score is available.
- Pending proposals
- 0. Proposals do not change published values until approved.
- An equal 980-point total does not establish equivalent variants or availability.
- There is no calibrated demand adjustment that would resolve this example into a winner.
Recorded history
No approved item changes have been recorded after the baseline. This does not establish that the market stayed unchanged. No historical chart is shown without observations.
Baseline only. There is not enough approved numerical history for a chart or a trend. A stored baseline does not establish that the market stayed unchanged.
Descriptive variation needs at least five numerical observations, numerical approvals spanning at least two weeks, and a nonzero mean.
| Record | Evidence date | Review | Trade Index score | Demand | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Existing dataset baseline | July 2, 2026 | Dataset baseline only. No item rereview. | 600 | Medium | Preserved starting snapshot |
Nearby stored numbers
Selected from the same game and unit by the smallest absolute difference: |other current number - this current number|. Ties use alphabetical order. This is a numerical comparison, not a recommended trade.
| Item | Trade Index score | Difference | Demand |
|---|---|---|---|
| Evil Unicorn | 620 | 20 | Medium |
| Blue Dog | 450 | 150 | Medium |
| Hedgehog | 750 | 150 | High |
| Arctic Reindeer | 420 | 180 | Medium |
Source comparisons
No item-level source comparison is recorded yet. The dataset baseline does not count as a fresh source check.
Approved history is linked to source observations. A failed check or an unresolved disagreement does not replace the stored value.
Source registry and limitationsPut this record to use
Compare a multi-item offerUnderstand value versus demand
Editorial rationale: No approved item review notes exist after the baseline. The explanation above describes stored facts and arithmetic, not a new market conclusion.
No approved market reports yet. Reports will appear after source comparisons and human editorial review.
Evidence dates
When was each dataset checked?
A source check records a collection attempt. An editorial review records a decision. The original baseline is not a new item review.
Adopt Me
- Latest source check attempt
- No source check recorded yet
- Latest successful source check
- Not recorded
- Latest item editorial decision
- No item review recorded yet
- Existing dataset baseline
- July 2, 2026
- Giraffe: Score Size and Demand Are Separate
- Frost Dragon: Compare One Item with a Bundle
- Owl: Why the Percentage Depends on Your Side
- Parrot: A Close Score Is Not an Exchange Rate
- Hedgehog: Similar Totals, Different Item Mixes
- Evil Unicorn: A Narrow Gap Needs Better Evidence
- Crow: Equal Bundle Totals Can Hide Different Labels
- Turtle: Compare Close Alternatives One at a Time
- Shadow Dragon
- Bat Dragon