Adopt Me item record

Evil Unicorn: A Narrow Gap Needs Better Evidence

Read the narrow Evil Unicorn and Crow baseline comparison and distinguish numerical ordering from confidence or a recommendation.

Draft analysis. Awaiting editorial review, excluded from search indexing. Stored values retain their original review dates.

Trade Index score620
DemandMedium
BaselineJuly 2, 2026
Last reviewedNo later item review

Baseline is the earliest approved record. Last reviewed means a later human-approved item review. Last checked means a source comparison, which is separate.

Compare this itemView Adopt Me Market
Your local watchlist

Scores are stored comparison estimates, not currency or guaranteed exchange rates.

Does the Evil Unicorn score establish an advantage over Crow?

Evil Unicorn has a baseline score of 620, compared with Crow at 600. The 20-point gap is approximately 3.33% of Crow. This places Evil Unicorn above Crow within the stored scale, but it is not an approved record of a rise from 600 to 620. The two numbers belong to different items.

Both demand labels are Medium. The baseline gives no confidence interval for either score, so it cannot show whether a 20-point difference is large relative to estimation uncertainty. Presenting a narrow gap with exact arithmetic does not make the underlying estimates equally precise.

Before relying on the ordering, inspect any approved item reviews and their source evidence. If there is no newer approved record, this comparison remains a baseline example. It supplies no categorical reason to accept one side.

Evidence and limits

Last item source comparison
Not recorded
Last approved item review
No approved item review after the baseline
Latest editorial decision
No item editorial decision recorded
Last recorded numerical direction
No approved movement recorded
Demand history
Previous label: Not recorded. Direction: No approved movement recorded.
Variation in stored observations
Not enough approved observations
Source agreement
Not enough comparable source evidence
Liquidity and confidence
Not measured. No transaction sample or calibrated confidence score is available.
Pending proposals
0. Proposals do not change published values until approved.
  • No statistical error bounds establish the significance of a 20-point score gap.
  • The comparison contains no item movement and must not appear as a market gain.

Recorded history

No approved item changes have been recorded after the baseline. This does not establish that the market stayed unchanged. No historical chart is shown without observations.

Baseline only. There is not enough approved numerical history for a chart or a trend. A stored baseline does not establish that the market stayed unchanged.

Descriptive variation needs at least five numerical observations, numerical approvals spanning at least two weeks, and a nonzero mean.

Baseline and approved item history. Source checks and pending proposals do not add published observations.
RecordEvidence dateReviewTrade Index scoreDemandReason
Existing dataset baselineJuly 2, 2026Dataset baseline only. No item rereview.620MediumPreserved starting snapshot

Nearby stored numbers

Selected from the same game and unit by the smallest absolute difference: |other current number - this current number|. Ties use alphabetical order. This is a numerical comparison, not a recommended trade.

Nearest same-game stored numbers
ItemTrade Index scoreDifferenceDemand
Crow60020Medium
Hedgehog750130High
Parrot780160High
Blue Dog450170Medium

Source comparisons

No item-level source comparison is recorded yet. The dataset baseline does not count as a fresh source check.

    Approved history is linked to source observations. A failed check or an unresolved disagreement does not replace the stored value.

    Source registry and limitations

    Put this record to use

    Compare a multi-item offer
    Understand value versus demand

    Editorial rationale: No approved item review notes exist after the baseline. The explanation above describes stored facts and arithmetic, not a new market conclusion.

    No approved market reports yet. Reports will appear after source comparisons and human editorial review.

    Evidence dates

    When was each dataset checked?

    A source check records a collection attempt. An editorial review records a decision. The original baseline is not a new item review.

    Adopt Me

    Latest source check attempt
    No source check recorded yet
    Latest successful source check
    Not recorded
    Latest item editorial decision
    No item review recorded yet
    Existing dataset baseline
    July 2, 2026
    Read market evidence