Adopt Me item record
Frost Dragon: Compare One Item with a Bundle
Work through a Frost Dragon versus Owl and Unicorn baseline example, with totals, the remaining gap, and limits of combining demand labels.
Draft analysis. Awaiting editorial review, excluded from search indexing. Stored values retain their original review dates.
Baseline is the earliest approved record. Last reviewed means a later human-approved item review. Last checked means a source comparison, which is separate.
Scores are stored comparison estimates, not currency or guaranteed exchange rates.
How does Frost Dragon compare numerically with Owl plus Unicorn?
Frost Dragon is 1,000 in the stored baseline. Owl is 850 and Unicorn is 100, so Owl plus Unicorn totals 950. That bundle is 50 points below Frost Dragon, or 5% of the Frost Dragon score. Adding the two records is transparent arithmetic, not a prediction of an accepted offer.
All three baseline demand labels are Very High. The bundle contains two items with that label while the other side contains one. Counting labels describes the bundle; it does not mean the bundle has twice the liquidity or twice as many interested traders.
For an actual offer, first confirm that its item variants match the comparison you intend to make. Then inspect approved records for each item independently. An unchanged total can hide a different item mix, and this example provides no evidence that a trader prefers the bundle.
Evidence and limits
- Last item source comparison
- Not recorded
- Last approved item review
- No approved item review after the baseline
- Latest editorial decision
- No item editorial decision recorded
- Last recorded numerical direction
- No approved movement recorded
- Demand history
- Previous label: Not recorded. Direction: No approved movement recorded.
- Variation in stored observations
- Not enough approved observations
- Source agreement
- Not enough comparable source evidence
- Liquidity and confidence
- Not measured. No transaction sample or calibrated confidence score is available.
- Pending proposals
- 0. Proposals do not change published values until approved.
- One Unicorn in this example is a separate item, not a measured conversion for a Frost Dragon add.
- The baseline does not quantify whether consolidating two items into one has a premium.
Recorded history
No approved item changes have been recorded after the baseline. This does not establish that the market stayed unchanged. No historical chart is shown without observations.
Baseline only. There is not enough approved numerical history for a chart or a trend. A stored baseline does not establish that the market stayed unchanged.
Descriptive variation needs at least five numerical observations, numerical approvals spanning at least two weeks, and a nonzero mean.
| Record | Evidence date | Review | Trade Index score | Demand | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Existing dataset baseline | July 2, 2026 | Dataset baseline only. No item rereview. | 1,000 | Very High | Preserved starting snapshot |
Nearby stored numbers
Selected from the same game and unit by the smallest absolute difference: |other current number - this current number|. Ties use alphabetical order. This is a numerical comparison, not a recommended trade.
Source comparisons
No item-level source comparison is recorded yet. The dataset baseline does not count as a fresh source check.
Approved history is linked to source observations. A failed check or an unresolved disagreement does not replace the stored value.
Source registry and limitationsPut this record to use
Compare a multi-item offerUnderstand value versus demand
Editorial rationale: No approved item review notes exist after the baseline. The explanation above describes stored facts and arithmetic, not a new market conclusion.
No approved market reports yet. Reports will appear after source comparisons and human editorial review.
Evidence dates
When was each dataset checked?
A source check records a collection attempt. An editorial review records a decision. The original baseline is not a new item review.
Adopt Me
- Latest source check attempt
- No source check recorded yet
- Latest successful source check
- Not recorded
- Latest item editorial decision
- No item review recorded yet
- Existing dataset baseline
- July 2, 2026
- Giraffe: Score Size and Demand Are Separate
- Frost Dragon: Compare One Item with a Bundle
- Owl: Why the Percentage Depends on Your Side
- Parrot: A Close Score Is Not an Exchange Rate
- Hedgehog: Similar Totals, Different Item Mixes
- Evil Unicorn: A Narrow Gap Needs Better Evidence
- Crow: Equal Bundle Totals Can Hide Different Labels
- Turtle: Compare Close Alternatives One at a Time
- Shadow Dragon
- Bat Dragon